Audit your AI before someone else finds the gaps.
A two-week scored audit against 111 items — OWASP LLM Top 10, agentic-attack surface, MCP server posture, post-quantum readiness — delivered with a remediation roadmap your CISO can act on.
$15,000–$25,000 Two weeks · fixed scope
Stylized trust-path diagram: prompt → model → tools → MCP servers → audit log, with red severity markers along the path and a green checkmark at the endpoint. Schematic, minimal, no stock-AI-brain illustration.AI in production is now a board-level liability.
Your auditors are asking. Your insurer is asking. Your board is asking. You don’t have a defensible answer yet — not one that names files, lines, and tool registrations.
You did not deploy an employee. You summoned a ghost. A ghost in your codebase, your patient-data store, or your transaction flow without cryptographically-attested wards around it is not a productivity gain — it is an unbounded liability you cannot see. The audit is the exorcism plus the grounding ritual: enumerate what was summoned, where it touches your trust boundaries, what it can reach, what it logs, what stops it.
Most AI security audits in 2026 don’t do that. They are slide decks dressed up as engineering. The findings are advisory. They are also wrong about half the time, because the auditor never read your code, never enumerated your MCP servers, and never tested whether your gateway actually rejects a prompt-injected tool call.
60% of organizations don’t have an AI governance or security policy in place to guard against shadow AI (IBM, Cybersecurity Trends in 2026). The board is asking. Your CISO needs an answer that holds up under cross-examination.
What you get
-
Scored audit report
111 items rated Pass / Open / Out-of-Scope across OWASP LLM Top 10, lifecycle phase, agentic-attack threat model, post-quantum readiness, and your sector-specific lens. Findings are tagged to the four-class AI technical-debt taxonomy.
-
Classed verdict
A one-page summary naming which of the four AI tech-debt classes you carry, which are critical, which are dormant. Designed to brief a board or privacy officer in five minutes.
-
Remediation roadmap
Every finding sized, ordered by severity and effort, with a concrete recommendation. Not "you failed item 47" — do this, in this order, and you will close it.
-
Threat model artifact
One-page diagram of trust boundaries, data flows, and adversary classes specific to your system. The artifact your CISO presents to the board.
-
Sign-off table
Completed scope, accepted residual risk, named owners, re-review date. Audit-trail-grade.
-
Executive summary (≤2 pages)
Calibrated for board, CISO, or external auditor consumption. Same document, two audiences.
-
30-minute readout call
Engineering and security leads walk every finding with the BST principal who did the work.
How it works
-
Kickoff & Access
Day 0–1Deliverable Signed contract, scope locked, read access provisioned
Contract signed, prerequisites confirmed, scope locked, read access provisioned. We do not begin technical work until access and scope are written down.
-
Audit (six sections)
Days 2–9Deliverable Findings against 111 items
OWASP, lifecycle, agentic, post-quantum, frontier red team, sector lens — applied to your actual system. We read code, enumerate MCP servers, and test whether your gateway actually rejects a prompt-injected tool call.
-
Scoring & Roadmap
Days 10–12Deliverable Sequenced remediation roadmap + executive summary draft
Findings scored, remediation sequenced, executive summary drafted, internal QA pass. Findings are tagged to the four-class AI technical-debt taxonomy so remediation can be sequenced by class, not just by severity.
-
Readout & Delivery
Days 13–14Deliverable Walkthrough call + signed report
Walkthrough call, revisions, signed report delivered. Engineering and security leads walk every finding with the BST principal who did the work.
Pricing
Engagement model Time & materials with not-to-exceed cap
A single AI feature on a single tenant lands at the lower end. Multi-tenant SaaS with several agents, MCP servers, and a regulated-industry lens lands at the upper end.
Anchor pricing reflects typical engagement ranges. Actual fees are scoped per engagement under time-and-materials with a not-to-exceed cap. Pricing shown does not constitute a binding offer.
Frequently asked questions
How long does this take?
What does this cost?
Is this a HIPAA / SOC 2 / ISO 27001 certification?
Can you audit a vendor system we don't own?
- Your prompts
- Your data exposure
- The vendor’s published security posture
- The MCP / tool / API surface you actually call
What if we fail badly?
Do you sign an NDA?
Know what your auditors will find, before they do.
Two weeks. Fixed scope. Scored report. NDA before any access.